Makes sense now, and after your change in r48061 I can confirm the "bad" unit that was failing before is now booting and working properly! Code:Starting linux kernel ..., machid: 0xffffffffWhy is the machine ID not properly defined?Regards Top Carson Post subject: Re: UBIFS error (pid 1): ubifs_mount: cannot open "ubi0:rootPosted: Fri Oct I/O size 4096 byteslibscan: scanning eraseblock 111 -- 100 % complete ubiformat: 110 eraseblocks have valid erase counter, mean value is 0ubiformat: 2 bad eraseblocks found, numbers: 74, 75ubiformat: flashing eraseblock Related 3Resize MTD partitions at runtime1Create flexible mtd partitions1mtd driver update with older kernel1Reason for ubi filesystem corruption3Corruption of UBI in UBIFS1MTD start and config at runtime0Android editing ubi/ubfs system image0How
Regards AnilKumar Please mark this Forum post as answered via the Verify Answer button below if it helps answer your question. I've attached the most recent bootlog once again. This could happen in case of misread at offset 0x600000. I/O unit sizes: 2048/2048, sub-page size 2048 [ 16.770718] UBI: VID header offset: 2048 (aligned 2048), data offset: 4096 [ 16.777781] UBI: good PEBs: 400, bad PEBs: 0, corrupted PEBs: 0 https://community.nxp.com/thread/351982
Ubifs Error -19
We are using NAND boot. Enlightened: The TI DLP® Blog Fully Charged Industrial Strength Launch Your Design Learn E2E Motor Drive & Control MSP Low-Power Plays On the Grid Power House Precision Hub The Process Think. Thanks & Regards Keldy Reply Cancel Cancel Reply Suggest as Answer Use rich formatting Guru 31315 points Renjith Thomas Jul 24, 2012 2:28 PM In reply to Keldy: 1.
I believe you are seeing this error because the 'rootfs_type' does not match what you flashed. If you are using NFS filesystem then make sure that NFS is up an running, nfs server ip is correct in bootargs and check whether the network working condition? my new image calculation is as below: 2Gb nand flash or 256MiB SP PEB size 128KiB SL LEB size 128KiB - 2 * 2KiB = 124KiB P Total number of PEBs Anyway, I've posted the two logs for comparison sake.
Want to know which application is best for the job? Ubiformat I don't know what's problem I have ? How to handle a common misconception when writing a Master's thesis? Last edited 11 months ago by rmilecki (previous) (diff) comment:6 Changed 10 months ago by rmilecki I hope this problem is finally fixed in trunk by r48061.
Main Menu LQ Calendar LQ Rules LQ Sitemap Site FAQ View New Posts View Latest Posts Zero Reply Threads LQ Wiki Most Wanted Jeremy's Blog Report LQ Bug Syndicate Latest Total pages: 65280 [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: console=ttyS0,115200 earlyprintk [ 0.000000] PID hash table entries: 512 (order: -1, 2048 bytes) [ 0.000000] Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, Can you install R8000 firmware from: https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/bcm53xx/generic/ and provide a new bootlog, please? Changed 11 months ago by jolouis Attachment r8000-testUBI.txt added Bootlog attempt 2 comment:2 Changed 11 months ago by jolouis Just gave it a try, unfortunately still seeing lots of mtd_read errors
What Could Cause Flash Over / Arcing to Reappear on New Plugs? see this If you are not following exact steps then we might hit this problem. Ubifs Error -19 volumes count: 128UBI: max/mean erase counter: 1/1, WL threshold: 4096, image sequence number: 1063368973UBI: available PEBs: 0, total reserved PEBs: 110, PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling: 78UBI: background thread "ubi_bgt0d" TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these
comment:8 Changed 10 months ago by rmilecki Resolution set to fixed Status changed from new to closed Trunk fixed in r48061, chaos_calmer in r48140. u-boot is from the git arm branch as of a few days ago. What SoC and board?What NAND flash is on the board? Now the ECC area will get overwritten with the new value.
What is this error message mean? using the samefile system image, butflashing to nand flash in u-boot, it will failed. flag is 0x00020000atmel_nand 60000000.nand: interrupt time out???? http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/UBIFS_Support Regards AnilKumar Please mark this Forum post as answered via the Verify Answer button below if it helps answer your question.
flag is 0x00020000atmel_nand 60000000.nand: interrupt time out???? Thanks! But getting kernel > panic when kernel tries to mount the rootfs.I am using arm-linux > kernel on at91sam9263 Soc gadget having 256M Nand flash.
Excerpt from http://gitorious.org/dockstar/emdebian-multistrap/blobs/master/mkubi-img.sh ..
below is the error:UBI: attaching mtd7 to ubi0UBI error: validate_ec_hdr: bad VID header offset 512, expected 4096UBI error: validate_ec_hdr: bad EC headerErase counter header dump: magic 0x55424923 version 1 ec 0
here i attach my boot log and my u-boot enviroment parameter.
modify fsl-image-core.bb script add image file type: IMAGE_FSTYPES = "ubi"build rootfs: I got 2 images:fsl-image-core-t1040rdb-20150408204106.rootfs.ubi fsl-image-core-t1040rdb-20150408204106.rootfs.ubifsI update rootfs partition mtdblock7 with " fsl-image-core-t1040rdb-20150408204106.rootfs.ubifs"Is the anything else need to set up to
If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI.
flag is 0x00020000atmel_nand 60000000.nand: interrupt time out????
Not the answer you're looking for?
Thanks & Regards Keldy Reply Cancel Cancel Reply Suggest as Answer Use rich formatting Guru 31315 points Renjith Thomas Jul 25, 2012 4:42 PM In reply to Keldy: Keldy, Can Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI. Did you try do narrow down the problem to a simpler use-case? I will post the changes i made to make ubifs and bootup log soon.
when booting the kernel image and file system, in the middle of booting process, the kernel panic with error VFS: Cannot open root device "ubi0:rootfs" or unknown-block(0,0). ubinize -o ubi.img -m 2048 -p 128KiB -s 512 -O 2048 ubinize.cfg with ubinize.cfg: [ubifs] mode=ubi image=ubifs.img vol_id=0 vol_size=192MiB vol_type=dynamic vol_name=rootfs vol_flags=autoresize i follow the exact the same as the So i increased the partition size to 128MB(nand_partition in kernel) and i recreated the UBIFS. US Election results 2016: What went wrong with prediction models?
This looks like you have issues on NAND flash driver or HW level, not in UBI/UBIFS. share|improve this answer answered Jan 9 '14 at 6:48 AnkurTank 4261623 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign volumes count: 128 [ 16.791062] UBI: max/mean erase counter: 5/2, WL threshold: 4096, image sequence number: 2129180187 [ 16.800281] UBI: available PEBs: 0, total reserved PEBs: 400, PEBs reserved for bad So, what happens here is when the kernel is up, UBI treats this page as erased and proceed to write data there without erase.
Code:UBI error: ubi_debugfs_init: carson debugfs (null)UBI error: ubi_init: carson err 0UBI error: ubi_init: carson mtd -19 p->name 1UBI error: ubi_init: carson out_slabUBI error: ubi_init: carson out_dev_unregUBI error: ubi_init: carson out_versionUBI error: I have the same error. I have attached a full bootlog and a config. comment:4 Changed 11 months ago by jolouis Okay that was interesting, see bootlog below. However this bad device has a bad block, see: Bad eraseblock 23 at 0x0000002e0000 it means nothing was written at 0x2e0000 and most likely everything starting with this offset is moved
Changed 10 months ago by jolouis Attachment r8000-badRootFIXED.txt added Unit that had been failing now detects UBI properly!